In the commit 94f6a80 on next-net, TIPC_NLA_LINK_NAME attribute should be
retrieved and validated via TIPC_NLA_LINK nesting entry in
tipc_nl_node_get_link().
According to that commit, TIPC_NLA_LINK_NAME value passing via
tipc link get command must follow above hierachy.

Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <hoang.h...@dektech.com.au>
---
 tipc/link.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tipc/link.c b/tipc/link.c
index 02f14aadefa6..a2d7c0016bc1 100644
--- a/tipc/link.c
+++ b/tipc/link.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static int cmd_link_get_prop(struct nlmsghdr *nlh, const 
struct cmd *cmd,
 {
        int prop;
        char buf[MNL_SOCKET_BUFFER_SIZE];
+       struct nlattr *attrs;
        struct opt *opt;
        struct opt opts[] = {
                { "link",               OPT_KEYVAL,     NULL },
@@ -131,7 +132,9 @@ static int cmd_link_get_prop(struct nlmsghdr *nlh, const 
struct cmd *cmd,
                fprintf(stderr, "error, missing link\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
+       attrs = mnl_attr_nest_start(nlh, TIPC_NLA_LINK);
        mnl_attr_put_strz(nlh, TIPC_NLA_LINK_NAME, opt->val);
+       mnl_attr_nest_end(nlh, attrs);
 
        return msg_doit(nlh, link_get_cb, &prop);
 }
-- 
2.1.4


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to