Hi Juhamatti, This is a good test plan indeed. If you encounter any problem during the testing, please share it here.
>From my view, TIPC had fully supported networking nemespace at least three years ago and its sockets could be fully isolated between containers. Thanks, Ying On 10/26/2018 11:12 AM, juham...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm planning to test TIPC scalability in more detail, especially > regarding the binding table and topology (service tracking) service > with large number of nodes (~1k) and sockets (100-1k). Is it enough to > do it with LXC containers with isolated namespaces to get realistic > results? My concern here is that if TIPC implementation would not > provide full isolation to sockets e.g. for performance reasons inside > the same kernel, then this may not provide results matching to real > environments. VMs are the other choice, but they tend to be heavy. Are > the namespaces fully isolated inside the kernel? > > Thanks for the info, > -- > Juhamatti > > > _______________________________________________ > tipc-discussion mailing list > tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion > _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
