From: Tuong Lien <tuong.t.l...@dektech.com.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:48:07 +0700

> According to the link FSM, when a link endpoint got RESET_MSG (- a
> traditional one without the stopping bit) from its peer, it moves to
> PEER_RESET state and raises a LINK_DOWN event which then resets the
> link itself. Its state will become ESTABLISHING after the reset event
> and the link will be re-established soon after this endpoint starts to
> send ACTIVATE_MSG to the peer.
> 
> There is no problem with this mechanism, however the link resetting has
> cleared the link 'in_session' flag (along with the other important link
> data such as: the link 'mtu') that was correctly set up at the 1st step
> (i.e. when this endpoint received the peer RESET_MSG). As a result, the
> link will become ESTABLISHED, but the 'in_session' flag is not set, and
> all STATE_MSG from its peer will be dropped at the link_validate_msg().
> It means the link not synced and will sooner or later face a failure.
> 
> Since the link reset action is obviously needed for a new link session
> (this is also true in the other situations), the problem here is that
> the link is re-established a bit too early when the link endpoints are
> not really in-sync yet. The commit forces a resync as already done in
> the previous commit 91986ee166cf ("tipc: fix link session and
> re-establish issues") by simply varying the link 'peer_session' value
> at the link_reset().
> 
> Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tuong Lien <tuong.t.l...@dektech.com.au>

Applied.


_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to