> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Fröhlich <peter.hans.froehl...@gmail.com> > Sent: 25-Apr-19 08:17 > To: Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com> > Cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] Subscribing for "all" service changes? > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:58 PM Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com> > wrote: > > No, we don't have any wildcard type for the service type itself, only for > changes for a given service type. > > I honestly have never thought about that, nor had any requirements for it. > > Bu I 'll give it a thought. > > Thank you! I don't know if it's an undue overhead to support a wildcard, but > if it's straightforward to add it would certainly be convenient. As of right > now > we just have a few services so I can add the IDs manually to configure > logging. But as we add more services it'll get easier and easier to forget to > keep that in sync. Also it seems that for links and nodes I already get the > desired behavior, but maybe there's something about the implementation > that makes this easier for those two than for all services.
Link and node subscriptions are just another two service types, and behave exactly like the rest. So, I don't understand your comment. Have I misunderstood your question? ///jon _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
