From: "Tuong Lien Tong" <tuong.t.l...@dektech.com.au> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:01:17 +0700
> Hi David, > > The fact is we still want to keep it with that explicit meaning, so make the > code easy to understand. Yes, the 'time_after32()' or another macro can give > the same result but makes no sense in this particular scenario. Otherwise, > do you like something such as: > > #define publication_after(...) time_after32(...) Yes, that's fine. _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
