From: John Rutherford <john.rutherf...@dektech.com.au>
In commit 4f07b80c9733 ("tipc: check msg->req data len in
tipc_nl_compat_bearer_disable") the same patch code was copied into
routines: tipc_nl_compat_bearer_disable(),
tipc_nl_compat_link_stat_dump() and tipc_nl_compat_link_reset_stats().
The two link routine occurrences should have been modified to check
the maximum link name length and not bearer name length.
Fixes: 4f07b80c9733 ("tipc: check msg->reg data len in
tipc_nl_compat_bearer_disable")
Signed-off-by: John Rutherford <john.rutherf...@dektech.com.au>
---
net/tipc/netlink_compat.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/netlink_compat.c b/net/tipc/netlink_compat.c
index e135d4e11231..d4d2928424e2 100644
--- a/net/tipc/netlink_compat.c
+++ b/net/tipc/netlink_compat.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int tipc_nl_compat_link_stat_dump(struct
tipc_nl_compat_msg *msg,
if (len <= 0)
return -EINVAL;
- len = min_t(int, len, TIPC_MAX_BEARER_NAME);
+ len = min_t(int, len, TIPC_MAX_LINK_NAME);
if (!string_is_valid(name, len))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static int tipc_nl_compat_link_reset_stats(struct
tipc_nl_compat_cmd_doit *cmd,
if (len <= 0)
return -EINVAL;
- len = min_t(int, len, TIPC_MAX_BEARER_NAME);
+ len = min_t(int, len, TIPC_MAX_LINK_NAME);
if (!string_is_valid(name, len))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
