On 12/12/19 2:46 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:42:00PM +0800, Ying Xue wrote:
>> On 12/11/19 10:00 AM, Tuong Lien Tong wrote:
>>>>
>>>> /* Move passive key if any */
>>>> if (key.passive) {
>>>> - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock);
>>>> + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2,
>>> &rx->lock);
>>> The 3rd parameter should be the lockdep condition checking instead of the
>>> spinlock's pointer i.e. "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)"?
>>> That's why I'd prefer to use the 'tipc_aead_rcu_swap ()' macro, which is
>>> clear & concise at least for the context here. It might be re-used later as
>>> well...
>>>
>>
>> Right. The 3rd parameter of rcu_replace_pointer() should be
>> "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)" instead of "&rx->lock".
>
> Like this?
Yes, I think it's better to set the 3rd parameter of
rcu_replace_pointer() with "lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock)".
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 575bb4ba1b22383656760feb3d122e11656ccdfd
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
> Date: Mon Dec 9 19:13:45 2019 -0800
>
> net/tipc: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace_pointer()
>
> This commit replaces the use of rcu_swap_protected() with the more
> intuitively appealing rcu_replace_pointer() as a step towards removing
> rcu_swap_protected().
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=z7-ggtm6wcvtyytxza1+bhqta4gg...@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
> [ paulmck: Updated based on Ying Xue and Tuong Lien Tong feedback. ]
> Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: <net...@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/crypto.c b/net/tipc/crypto.c
> index 990a872..c8c47fc 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/crypto.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/crypto.c
> @@ -257,9 +257,6 @@ static char *tipc_key_change_dump(struct tipc_key old,
> struct tipc_key new,
> #define tipc_aead_rcu_ptr(rcu_ptr, lock) \
> rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock))
>
> -#define tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock)
> \
> - rcu_swap_protected((rcu_ptr), (ptr), lockdep_is_held(lock))
> -
> #define tipc_aead_rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, lock) \
> do { \
> typeof(rcu_ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), \
> @@ -1189,7 +1186,7 @@ static bool tipc_crypto_key_try_align(struct
> tipc_crypto *rx, u8 new_pending)
>
> /* Move passive key if any */
> if (key.passive) {
> - tipc_aead_rcu_swap(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2, &rx->lock);
> + tmp2 = rcu_replace_pointer(rx->aead[key.passive], tmp2,
> lockdep_is_held(&rx->lock));
> x = (key.passive - key.pending + new_pending) % KEY_MAX;
> new_passive = (x <= 0) ? x + KEY_MAX : x;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
