On 1/11/21 9:20 AM, Xue, Ying wrote:
- seq = &dest->addr.nameseq;
- if (dest->addrtype == TIPC_ADDR_MCAST)
- return tipc_sendmcast(sock, seq, m, dlen, timeout);
-
- if (dest->addrtype == TIPC_SERVICE_ADDR) {
- type = dest->addr.name.name.type;
- inst = dest->addr.name.name.instance;
- dnode = dest->addr.name.domain;
- dport = tipc_nametbl_lookup_anycast(net, type, inst, &dnode);
- if (unlikely(!dport && !dnode))
+ /* Determine destination */
+ if (atype == TIPC_SERVICE_RANGE) {
[Ying] Regarding my understanding, we should compare "atype" with
TIPC_ADDR_MCAST rather than TIPC_SERVICE_RANGE. Please help to confirm.
Right. Except that they are the same (value == 1). I wanted to simplify
by only using one of the macros inside the kernel code.
///jon
+ return tipc_sendmcast(sock, &ua->sr, m, dlen, timeout);
+ } else if (atype == TIPC_SERVICE_ADDR) {
+ skaddr.node = ua->lookup_node;
+ ua->scope = skaddr.node ? TIPC_NODE_SCOPE : TIPC_CLUSTER_SCOPE;
+ if (!tipc_nametbl_lookup_anycast(net, ua, &skaddr))
return -EHOSTUNREACH;
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
