This patch looks good to me. -----Original Message----- From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:25 PM To: Jon Maloy <jma...@redhat.com>; Xue, Ying <ying....@windriver.com>; David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>; linux-harden...@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RESEND][next] tipc: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall through to the next case. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> --- net/tipc/link.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644 --- a/net/tipc/link.c +++ b/net/tipc/link.c @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt) break; case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT: l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER; + break; case LINK_FAILURE_EVT: case LINK_RESET_EVT: case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT: -- 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
