This reverts commit 0efea3c649f0 because of:
- The returning -ENOBUF error is fine on socket buffer allocation.
- There is side effect in the calling path
tipc_node_xmit()->tipc_link_xmit() when checking error code returning.

Fixes: 0efea3c649f0 ("tipc: Return the correct errno code")
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jma...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <hoang.h...@dektech.com.au>
---
 net/tipc/link.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index cf586840caeb..1b7a487c8841 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int link_schedule_user(struct tipc_link *l, struct 
tipc_msg *hdr)
        skb = tipc_msg_create(SOCK_WAKEUP, 0, INT_H_SIZE, 0,
                              dnode, l->addr, dport, 0, 0);
        if (!skb)
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               return -ENOBUFS;
        msg_set_dest_droppable(buf_msg(skb), true);
        TIPC_SKB_CB(skb)->chain_imp = msg_importance(hdr);
        skb_queue_tail(&l->wakeupq, skb);
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ void tipc_link_reset(struct tipc_link *l)
  *
  * Consumes the buffer chain.
  * Messages at TIPC_SYSTEM_IMPORTANCE are always accepted
- * Return: 0 if success, or errno: -ELINKCONG, -EMSGSIZE or -ENOBUFS or -ENOMEM
+ * Return: 0 if success, or errno: -ELINKCONG, -EMSGSIZE or -ENOBUFS
  */
 int tipc_link_xmit(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff_head *list,
                   struct sk_buff_head *xmitq)
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ int tipc_link_xmit(struct tipc_link *l, struct 
sk_buff_head *list,
                        if (!_skb) {
                                kfree_skb(skb);
                                __skb_queue_purge(list);
-                               return -ENOMEM;
+                               return -ENOBUFS;
                        }
                        __skb_queue_tail(transmq, skb);
                        tipc_link_set_skb_retransmit_time(skb, l);
-- 
2.30.2



_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to