> -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Maloy <jma...@redhat.com> > On 2023-06-22 09:30, Rune Torgersen wrote: > > I can easily make it happen with known service addresses too. > > > > We have shortlived processes that does a query: > > > > Open 226 1 > > Send query to 226 2. > > 226 2 sends response back to 226 1. - Message gets dropped. > > Is there any reason why you don't use the received messages original > socket address instead of its service address?
Basically because we did not know you could do that. Will have to look into that. Is there any example code for that? _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
