> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Maloy <jma...@redhat.com>
> On 2023-06-22 09:30, Rune Torgersen wrote:
> > I can easily make it happen with known service addresses too.
> >
> > We have shortlived processes that does a query:
> >
> > Open 226 1
> > Send query to 226 2.
> > 226 2 sends response back to 226 1. - Message gets dropped.
> 
> Is there any reason why you don't use the received messages original
> socket address instead of its service address?

Basically because we did not know you could do that. Will have to look into 
that. Is there any example code for that?



_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to