FWIW, my code changes did manage to fix the problems I was having with 
idempotent datagram requests, where I could retransmit either way safely. 
Things got messier for a non-idempotent service with either dropped datagrams 
or dropped connections due to the link reset. So far, the only thing I have 
found to mitigate the problem is increasing the UDP media/bearer/link tolerance 
from 1500 to 5000. At least the tests I have run so far seem happier with it.

                                                  Gary Duzan
                                                  IT Architect Senior
                                                  GT.M Core Team

________________________________
From: Duzan, Gary D via tipc-discussion <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 4:46 PM
To: Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.q.ngu...@dektech.com.au>; 
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] Tuning/Debugging of "Retransmission failure"


Tung Quang Nguyen
5/15/2024 11:56 PM
Not sure what you mean by "pushing TIPC a bit". If it means dropping TIPC 
messages, then "Retransmission failure" is expected.
   It just means that I increased the amount of traffic across TIPC in the 
cluster. I only noticed because it appeared from the application level that 
messages were being dropped. I do have TIPC_DEST_DROPPABLE and 
TIPC_SRC_DROPPABLE set to zero, but I just realized that I only have the 
TIPC_ERRINFO handling on one end. I should fix that.

Tung Quang Nguyen
5/15/2024 11:56 PM
If you did not intentionally drop TIPC messages, then issue could be due to 
packet drop at NIC (in your VM node or host or Switch/Router etc.). You need to 
do the tunning at NIC.
   Running some more tests, it does appear that my clusters of larger servers 
with eth bearers are not encountering this issue, but my clusters of smaller 
servers with udp bearers are. There is also some disparity in 
net.tipc.tipc_rmem settings, so I should address that.

   So it looks like I have some things to try. I'll follow up if that doesn't 
address the problem.

   Thanks.

Gary Duzan
IT Architect Senior
GT.M Core Team

________________________________
From: Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.q.ngu...@dektech.com.au>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 11:56 PM
To: Duzan, Gary D <gary.du...@fisglobal.com>; 
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: Tuning/Debugging of "Retransmission failure"


>   I've started to notice messages like this when pushing TIPC a bit:
Not sure what you mean by "pushing TIPC a bit". If it means dropping TIPC 
messages, then "Retransmission failure" is expected.
>Is there any tuning I can do to avoid the problem, or other data to collect to 
>better understand it?
>
If you did not intentionally drop TIPC messages, then issue could be due to 
packet drop at NIC (in your VM node or host or Switch/Router etc.). You need to 
do the tunning at NIC.
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you. Message Encrypted via TLS 
connection

_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Ftipc-discussion&data=05%7C02%7Cgary.duzan%40fisglobal.com%7Cd4e9b48e25094d3a586508dc75e962c0%7Ce3ff91d834c84b15a0b418910a6ac575%7C0%7C0%7C638514892444800272%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=C%2F7M%2BcPUuQlPRZIQd7k7OicwrZFtRG6vYK9aFKyfP50%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you. Message Encrypted via TLS 
connection

_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to