Ah, yes, seeping out of my "ineffable etwas" is the memory of Mowrer and "hope". Having been trained by dust bowl empiricists, however, the word was pronounced with a slight sneer. I would classify Mowrer more in the Lashley tradition. Wasn't there something a little unusual about Mowrer?
Harry Avis PhD Sierra College Rocklin, CA 95677 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Life is opinion - Marcus Aurelius There is nothing that is good or bad, but that thinking makes it so - Shakespeare >From: Michael Sylvester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: info: Mowrer >Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:18 -0500 (EST) > >did Mowrer postulate a "hope" variable in explaining some aspect of >learning? >and if he did,could he also be labelled as a limited cognitive theorist? > >Michael Sylvester,PhD >Daytona Beach,Florida > > > > > > > > >--- >You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
