> > I really wish that these types of interchanges, that occur between Jim and > others who are responding to Jim's (dare I say, his trolls), would be > carried out offline. The relation to psychological sciences is tangential > at best. Now, maybe some on this list look forward to reading and > responding to these things, but not me. > > > > > > Ed Callen > > Chair, Psychology Dept. > > USC Aiken > > Aiken, SC 29801
Dear Ed, I am sorry for your inconvenience. I am well aware that my contributions to this list are disproportionately from the religious realm, and must take some responsibility for the troll accusation. However, if you check the archives, you will see I did not start this thread, and merely raised some questions. Some of my comments were debatable enough to raise additional questions, and I have merely tried to clarify those issues. I assumed the thread was done until once again someone on the list decided to make overgeneralizations about religious individuals without using precise language or supporting data. Should that be tolerated? Are we making attempts to understand a segment of our culture, or we content to throw stones? Isn't understanding any group of people part of teaching psychology? Respectfully, Jim G --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
