All- Having sat back and listened for a while, I'd like to add this to the notes on 
the Gazzaniga cover. While some may find it indicative of a conspiracy, I suspect the 
cover shot was chosen at least in part because the publisher's already owned the 
rights or it is public domain (or just old enough that they got cheap use of it from 
the photographer). If you follow that then it is not a big jump in logic to remember 
that not that long ago the communist block ruled world women's track and field (some 
of you already see). I would hazard to guess that the editors probably patted 
themselves for finding a picture with all these characteristics: cheap and reasonably 
interesting with the bonus of including a minority as virtually all the events were 
dominated by middle European women. I also suspect they were far more worried about 
feedback about the fetus. Frankly I don't like the composition of the picture anyway 
as it violates basic precepts of image construction (which, I might add, are based on 
visual perception and processing strategies). Just another 2 cents. But I too think 
Michael is getting a chuckle about anyone actually caring. What Michael in all his 
"centric" conspiracy seems to forget is that such a controversy would only increase 
sales- especially among conservatives. Ironic, no? 
Tim Shearon
______________________________________________
Timothy Shearon, PhD
Professor of Psychology,
Albertson College of Idaho
Caldwell, ID 83605
Teaching interests: Neuropsychology, physiological psychology, History and Systems, 
Psychology and Film Theory
 
 

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Charlotte Manly [mailto:charlotte.manly@;louisville.edu] 
        Sent: Sun 10/27/2002 8:46 AM 
        To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: Gazzaniga's intro text
        
        
        I agree.  Gazzaniga would want to know.  And while we're on the topic of 
pictures, I'll mention that our department dropped the use of a particular text based 
on the nature of its biased coverage of race in the context of IQ and cognitive & 
social development, and the problem came to light starting with a picture of three 
African-American women of varying hue, the caption of which discussed the relationship 
between skin color and degree of African heritage.  Apparently racial purity and 
genetic testing are hot-button issues for African-Americans, and that's not counting 
the other hot-button issues revolving around the history of IQ testing and the various 
uses to which it has been put.

        Charlotte


<<winmail.dat>>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to