While I have no insight to shed on the cover of Gazzaniga's textbook, I have a good friend who tells some revealing stories about the process of publishing a successful intro psych textbook. One of these is that the publishers obtained a second author, without the knowledge of the first author, for the Canadian market. Apparently their marketing surveys showed that the Canadian audience was sensitive to issues of American cultural imperialism >:) and that a Canadian co-author was essential.

esther

At 12:00 AM 10/27/02 -0400, Teaching in the Psychological Sciences digest wrote:
The interesting question is the mindset of whoever is in charge of
determining textbook cover art. What we've established is that the
author may not be responsible, and in the Gazzaniga textbook case
discussed, the cover shows a white woman beating two others, one
black, one white. We've also established that in track-and-field,
neither blacks nor whites dominate. All of that is educational, and
I'm glad we have this thread to inform us.

But the question remains. Why did someone think it was a good idea to
put that particular illustration on the cover?  Since it's
introductory psychology and not exercise physiology, why a sports
event? Why not a picture of a brain (especially appropriate for a
Gazzaniga text), figure-ground or other psychological illusion,
picture of Pavlov, Skinner, Freud, a cute baby or a happy family? If
it had to be a an athletic depiction, why choose one in which one
individual, especially one whose race is obvious, triumphs over
another? Why not choose one emphasizing teamwork (black and white
women pulling together in a tug-of-war, black woman handing a baton
off to a white woman in a relay race, black and white women climbing
together)? Why choose a divisive depiction which is guaranteed to
raise questions about its significance and in which the selector has
to make a decision: whom do we depict winning? And why only show
women, anyway?

This suggests to me that a content analysis of cover art of
psychology textbooks is overdue. And I have a lurking suspicion,
although I admit it's far-fetched. What if whoever was responsible
for this textbook cover decided it was a clever idea to produce it in
different versions to target different markets? Is it possible
there's a version out there in which a black woman beats a white? Far-
fetched perhaps, but not beyond the overheated imagination of
marketing specialists.

Stephen
______________________________________________________________
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.            tel:  (819) 822-9600 ext 2470
Department of Psychology         fax:  (819) 822-9661
Bishop's  University           e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennoxville, QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to