Paul C. Smith wrote (among other stuff):
I wonder if there's anyone willing to fess up to being the "we" in thisIn one of my lives, I work at a private practice that has 9 therapists (2 clinical psych; one masters in psych who is a psychometrist, and is certified as a marriage and family therapist; and 6 social workers. The 10th professional is the psychiatrist who owns the place and who does nothing but medication evaluations, medication checks, and supervision of the staff. When one of the therapists believes that one of their clients (adult or child) is in need of medication, we have to present our case to the psychiatrist and then schedule an evaluation. The final decision is his but is done in consultation with us. I believe that there are some situations in which children who do not need medication get medication -- but I also believe that there are very few, if any, who are involved with our practice. The biggest problem that we have is with kids who have been diagnosed with a DSM-IV diagnosis and medicated by non psychologist/psychiatrist/social worker. There are many family practice physicians and pediatric practitioners who deal with problems beyond their abilities. I can tell horror stories, and I can tell miracle stories, but remember, in most states, we don't prescribe. Fortunately in the practice with which I am involved, we do get to consult.
situation. Who exactly is demanding that medication? What are their
arguments for doing so? Is there anyone making a conscious argument in favor
of medication, or is it just somehow slipping in as unintended consequence
of some other decisions?
I've heard the complaints about over-medication of children so many times
now that I'm really curious about the nature of the "pro-medication" side.
Bob Wildblood, PhD
Psychologist & HSPP
Lecturer in Psychology
Indiana University Kokomo
Kokomo, IN 46904-9003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
