Rod,
 
Maybe an example closer to home would help.  Give him as an example his score on two 
hypothetical exams in the same class.  Set it up so his numerical score on the first 
exam is lower than his numerical score on the second exam, but on the first exam is 
above the mean of the class and below it on the second exam.  Ask him which exam he 
did better on.  Obviously he did higher on the second, but relatively (and on the 
grading curve) he did poorer on the second exam.  Maybe that will get him thinking a 
little outside his box.
 
Dave

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Hetzel, Rod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Mon 2/24/2003 5:08 PM 
        To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences 
        Cc: 
        Subject: z-score woes
        
        

        Hi everyone:
        
        I need your help with something.  I have a student who just does not
        understand z-scores.  I have met with him for at least two hours outside
        of class and he still doesn't understand the concept.  In particular, he
        doesn't seem to understand why you need to include standard deviation in
        the calculation of z-scores.  "Why can't you just compare the raw
        scores?" is his frequent question.  I explained to him in various ways
        that the z-score is a transformed score that can take scores from two
        different distributions and put them on a common metric, that it gives
        you a summary statistic that tells you an individual's score in relation
        to the mean and standard deviation, that it provides a way to compare
        scores from two different distributions, etc.  
        
        Here is the example that my student keeps coming back to:  "Jack and
        Jill are intense competitors, but they never competed against each
        other.  Jack specialized in long-distance running and Jill was an
        excellent sprint swimmer.  As you can see from the distributions in each
        table, each was best in their event.  Take the analysis one step farther
        and use z-scores to determine who is the more outstanding competitor."
        
        LONG-DISTANCE RUNNING
        Jack: 37 min
        Bob:  39 min
        Joe:  40 min
        Ron:  42 min
        
        SPRING SWIMMING
        Jill: 24 sec
        Sue:  26 sec
        Peg:  27 sec
        Ann:  28 sec
        
        Here are the relevant statistics:
        RUNNING MEAN:  39.5
        RUNNING SD:  1.803
        JACK'S ZSCORE:  -1.39
        
        SWIMMING MEAN:  26.25
        SWIMMING SD:  1.479
        JILL'S ZSCORE:  -1.52
        
        When I have met with the student, he has not understood how Jill is the
        more outstanding competitor.  He makes the comment that Jack is
        obviously the better competitor because Jack scored an entire 3 minutes
        faster than the next finisher whereas Jill scored only 2 seconds faster
        than her runner-up.  "Why do you have to even look at the other scores
        in the distribution to tell that Jack is the better competitor?  He
        finished a full three minutes ahead of his competitors and Jill just
        barely finished ahead of her competitors."  I have drawn some diagrams
        of normal distributions to show how Jill's score on the distribution is
        further away from the mean and closer to the tail, but my student thinks
        that I am somehow changing the scores and cheating the system when I
        transform the raw scores to z-scores.  Even after I show him how the
        position of the score remains unchanged, he cannot grasp in this case
        how Jill is the more outstanding competitor.  I've tried switching
        examples with him (e.g., distributions of test scores, changing C
        temperature to F temperature, etc.), but nothing seems to be sinking in.
        He has a fairly high level of anxiety about statistics but tends to
        cover it up with humor and sarcasm.  He took statistics with another
        professor last semester and told me that all statistics is a bunch of
        bull**** that serves no useful purpose other than obscuring the
        painfully-obvious truth.
        
        So, I have two questions for all of you out there in TIPS land...
        
        1.  Given what I've told you about the student's struggles with
        z-scores, does anyone have any specific ideas on how to present this
        information to him?  I think I'm in a rut with him and need a fresh way
        to explain this.
        
        2.  Would anyone be willing to share with me any z-score examples that
        you use for your own assignments and exams?  I am running out of new
        examples to use with this student and was hoping that perhaps you would
        be willing to share some of your own examples.  This would give my
        student some more opportunities to calculate z-scores 
        
        3.  How do you work with students who just don't seem to get statistics?
        Everyone else in the class seems to understand z-scores well, but I'm
        struggling a bit in trying to reach this student.  I find that I am
        hardly ever at a loss for words when teaching clinical courses, but I'm
        reaching my limit with this student.  This is certainly not my area of
        expertise, so I'm hoping that some of you stats-people can help out with
        this!
        
        Thanks for your assistance with this problem!
        
        Rod
        
        ---
        You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        

<<winmail.dat>>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to