In today's New York Times there is an interesting article about a host
of errors coming from one research lab at John Hopkins. Although the
piece is nicely researched is is too bad that the journalist ends the
piece by using anecdotal evidence from heavy ecstasy users to apparently
"argue" that heavy ecstasy use is dangerous. A better solution would be
to conduct better research (or at least not publish flawed research). I
also wonder about retracting already published articles (according to
the articles 4 articles had to be retracted). How do you really remove
(after the fact) published articles?
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/02/science/02ECST.html
--
*********************************************
Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
Dickinson College, P.O. Box 1773
Carlisle, PA 17013
Office: (717) 245-1562, Fax: (717) 245-1971
*********************************************
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
