|
If someone was really serious about measuring some of the correlates of
self-reported "test-taking ability," I would certainly argue for
including a measure of general intelligence. (A brief measure such as
the Wonderlic or Otis Quick-Scoring might be adequate.) In this age
when everyone is "above average," I suspect that some are actually
below average in important cognitive abilities, and they are quick to
demonstrate the fundamental attribution error. --Dave -- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- "poor test-takers?" Beth Benoit
- Re: "poor test-takers?" Christopher D. Green
- Re: "poor test-takers?" John W. Nichols, M.A.
- Re: "poor test-takers?" John W. Nichols, M.A.
- Re: "poor test-takers?" David Campbell
- Re: "poor test-takers?" Beth Benoit
- Re: "poor test-takers?" Miguel Roig
- Re: "poor test-takers?" David Campbell
- Re: "poor test-takers?" Annette Taylor, Ph. D.
- Re: "poor test-takers?" John W. Nichols, M.A.
- RE: "poor test-takers?" Shearon, Tim
- Re: "poor test-takers?" John W. Nichols, M.A.
- RE: "poor test-takers?" DeVolder Carol L
- Re: "poor test-takers?" Christopher D. Green
- Re: "poor test-takers?" Christopher D. Green
