I'm wondering if observing it in the mirror was the cause of the illusion.
(Especially if the mirror was a polarized one???)
Beth Benoit
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Wagon-wheel illusion again


> Just recently we were discussing the wagon-wheel illusion, and if I
> recall correctly, both Tom Alloway's students and Beth Benoit
> reported seeing the phenomenon under steady illumination while
> driving down the highway.
>
> By coincidence, there's a report just out (well, I just spotted it
> anyway) investigating the phenomenon. They say it doesn't occur under
> steady illumination under laboratory conditions. So students of Tom
> and Beth,  science says you didn't see what you saw. I append the
> abstract below. It has the distinction of coming from theoretical
> physicists and from Iran, a rather unusual source on both counts, it
> seems to me.
>
> If I may speculate on the discrepancy between what science found and
> what people experienced, I wonder if under real-life conditions such
> as driving down the highway, what appears to be steady illumination
> may actually be flickering. For example, if the light illuminating
> the wheels was interrupted by trees or by posts along the highway, it
> would flicker, and so understandably cause the effect. I seem to
> recall that epileptic seizures have been triggered in susceptible
> individuals by such flickering when driving down a road lined with
> trees.
>
> Stephen
>
> Perception. 2003;32(11):1307-10.
> Wagon-wheel illusion under steady illumination: real or illusory?
> Pakarian P, Yasamy MT.
>
> School of Intelligent Systems, Institute for Studies in Theoretical
> Physics and Mathematics (IPM), Niavaran Square, Tajrish, Tehran, PO
> Box 19395-5746, Iran. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Wheels turning in the movies sometimes appear to rotate backwards.
> This is called the wagon-wheel illusion (WWI). The mechanism of this
> illusion is based on the intermittent nature of light in films and
> other stroboscopic presentations, which renders them as a series of
> snapshots rather than a continuous visual data stream. However, there
> have been claims that this illusion is seen even in continuous light,
> which would suggest that the visual system itself may sample a
> continuous visual data stream. We examined the rate of this putative
> sampling and its variations across individuals while in different
> psychological states. We obtained two results: (i) WWI occurred in
> stroboscopic lights as expected, (ii) WWI was never reported by our
> subjects under continuous lights, such as sunlight and lamps with DC
> power source. Thus, WWI cannot be taken as evidence for discreteness
> of conscious visual perception.
> ___________________________________________
> Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.            tel:  (819) 822-9600 ext 2470
> Department of Psychology         fax:  (819) 822-9661
> Bishop's  University          e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lennoxville, QC  J1M 1Z7
> Canada
>
> Dept web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
> TIPS discussion list for psychology teachers at
>  http://faculty.frostburg.edu/psyc/southerly/tips/index.htm
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to