Michael: OK, I'll take the bait.
Europeans are not the highest scoring "group" on the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler tests (using group categories of common usage). So Europeans are deficient on their own tests! (if you want to use the word "deficient" - I don't). Want to talk bias? The slope relating IQ score to real-life success is basically identical for all "groups". If anything, the tests are biased against white Europeans and Orientals because they typically under-estimate real-world success. Minorities [as routinely defined] fare better on acceptances if standardized tests are used, as opposed to, say, high-school grades. You can talk about different "intelligences" if you like, but many of the alternative intelligences proposed by, e.g. Gardner, are better described as skills, talents or aptitudes. Why so? The word intelligence as historically used covers the "stuff" we put on IQ tests. To use intelligence in reference to interpersonal or athletic skills is re-defining the word. SO, talk about other traits all you want, but please: get your own word! "Intelligence" is already taken. I could go on and on, but, is there any point?? ============================================ John W. Kulig Professor of Psychology Plymouth State College Plymouth NH 03264 ============================================ Za dvumia zaitsami pogonish'sia - ni odnogo ne poimaesh [If you chase after two rabbits, you won't catch even one]Russian proverb. > -----Original Message----- > From: michael sylvester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:54 AM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences > Subject: Eurogenic Psychology 2 > > > > One aspect of EP is its pre-occupation with "reliability" > and not much consideration to "validity".Reliability is > just one aspect of measuring an idea,this still does not mean > that the idea is valid.EP contain lots of constructs as > intelligence ,personality,motivation defined within a Eurogenic > schema -where individual differences are emphasized in a Eurocentric > environment.But applying these concepts to a non-Eurogenic > environment often leads to an assumed deficiency attribution to > blacks,Hispanics and others.There are valid concepts but how they > are defined are critical.Intelligence may be defined as the ability > to adapt to existing environments.With this in mind,it would appear > basketball players depict maximum adaptive ability at Notre Dame and > other colleges.Raising academic standards of the paper and pencil > type to judge skills in an area where different skills are > required just does not make sense.I still do not understand > why people think that a star athelete should be doing good > academically.These may be different intelligences.Is one form > of intelligence better than another? and what about motivation? > > Michael Sylvester,PhD > Daytona Beach,Florida > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
