Louis, we are talking about an academic situation; not speeding. In addition to being ethically questionable, another concern that arises is that the intended effect of your 'fine' will differ as function of the offending student's socioeconomic status.

I'd love to see the relevant statement in your syllabus but, nevertheless, I think that you should consider changing your penalty statement.

Miguel


At 01:22 PM 6/2/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Why is it ethically questionable? It's a "fine" for lying like a fine for speeding--and is in the syllabus. Reasoning behind it? It gives them "food for thought." The students tend to remember their omission a lot longer when they have to pay such a fine while at the same time being given another chance. I'm not one of those "one strike and you're out" guys. I do the same thing with cell phones ringing in the classroom. In fact, I've even had to pay that penalty when my son called about literally a second before I switched the phone to vibrate.


Make it a good day.

                                                       --Louis--


Louis Schmier www.therandomthoughts.com Department of History www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /~\ /\ /\ (229-333-5947) /^\ / \ / /~ \ /~\__/\ / \__/ \/ / /\ /~ \ /\/\-/ /^\___\______\_______/__/_______/^\ -_~ / "If you want to climb mountains, \ /^\ _ _ / don't practice on mole hills" -\____



---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to