Number of chairs is at least ratio measurement, and according to some, it is even better: absolute measurement. (The data cannot be transformed in any way without altering the meaning of the numbers.) So, parametric stats are perfectly okay, even for those who believe that parametric stats should be limited to interval data. (Statisticians don't believe in that restriction, as we have discussed at least once before on this list, so please let's not go there.)
    don
    Donald McBurney
    Universits of Pittsburgh

Don Allen wrote:
I quite agree, and I wish it were the only lapse in APS editing. In
Holland et al. "Don't Stand So Close to Me: The Effects of Self-Construal
on Interpersonal Closeness" ( Psychological Science Volume 15 Issue 4 Page
237  - April 2004 ). They report the following methodology:

"After completing the lexical decision task, the participants were asked
to take a seat in a waiting area, ostensibly to give the experimenter some
time to prepare the second part of the experiment. Four chairs were lined
up in the waiting area, with a jacket hanging over the chair on the
extreme left. This jacket suggested the presence of another person (Macrae
& Johnston, 1998). The dependent variable was the distance, *** in number
of chairs, *** (my emphasis) between the chair with the jacket on it and
the chair that the participant chose to sit on."

They then analyse the data as follows:

"To examine the effects of self-construal and gender, we performed a 2
(self-construal: independent vs. control)2 (gender: female vs. male)
between-subjects analysis of variance on the distance between the
participant's chair and the occupied chair. As expected, participants in
the independent-self condition sat further away (M=2.07) than participants
in the control condition (M=1.66), F(1, 73)=8.57, p<.01. 1 No main effect
of gender was obtained. Also, no interaction effect was found."

Now I have a hard time accepting that "number of chairs" is interval data.
A non parametric analysis would have been far more appropriate.  Editorial
rigour just ain't what it used to be.

-Don.



Stephen Black said:
  
Ronald C. Blue wrote:

      
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/media/releases/2004/pr040819.cfm
        
First Solid Evidence that the Study of Music Promotes Intellectual
Development
      
and Chris Greeen commented:

    
Now none of this is out and out "wrong,"
      
Oh, it's wrong all right. See earlier exchanges on this "solid
evidence", between Ken Steele and me, for example, at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10749.html

Stephen

___________________________________________________
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.            tel:  (819) 822-9600 ext 2470
Department of Psychology         fax:  (819) 822-9661
Bishop's  University   	       e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennoxville, QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

Dept web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
TIPS discussion list for psychology teachers at
 http://faculty.frostburg.edu/psyc/southerly/tips/index.htm
_______________________________________________


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    


  
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to