Here's a different take on the attendance issue. As an undergrad at Berkeley, I had a number of classes in which the professor didn't seem to care or notice if we were there or not, and I always purchased the detailed notes made by a grad student and sold through a campus organization for these classes. So my attendance was sporadic. Of course I was there when a test was coming up, but on other days I would go to the library to study or engage in some other activity at class time.

But now with a parent/teacher perspective, I feel that I cheated myself. Student learning is associated with time exposed to the material--and being in class is a first step in exposure to the material for that day. As a teacher, I hate the idea of spending time preparing for class only to be met by a partial audience. As a parent, I dislike the notion of my children skipping class--esp. when I am footing the bill. So I alway pass around an attendance sheet and make attendance a part of the "participation" component of the course grade (usually 8-10%). This plus weekly quizzes helps to ensure that everyone is there for our "work" each class meeting. This keeps everyone honest and they seem to like the procedure, given the positive course evals.

As you can see, I would rather sidestep the question of uneven attendance by structuring the class so that attendance will remain high, week after week.

--Dave

Rick Froman wrote:

I know that we have discussed the fact that studying over the course of a semester is not actually on a fixed interval (even with the phenomenon of cramming being so common) because that would mean that the first response of studying after the test would be reinforced. However, is it correct to say that attendance in class might be on a fixed interval schedule if test dates are fixed in the syllabus? The reason I ask is because attendance records in my Intro class show the usual scalloping patterns: high attendance right before a test with large dropoffs afterward with attendance increasing again right before and through the next test. This really seems counterinituitive from a rational or cognitive perspectve because I don’t review for tests during class and so no particular class period has an advantage over any other in terms of preparation for the test. This clearly looks like a fixed interval pattern. Is this evidence that tests reinforce attendance behavior? On the other side of the coin, is it evidence that class periods in which tests are not given are not reinforcing? Possibly other more inherently interesting profs don’t see such a pronounced scallop in attendance patterns.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman
Professor of Psychology
John Brown University
2000 W. University
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(479) 524-7295
http://www.jbu.edu/academics/sbs/faculty/rfroman.asp

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
___________________________________________________________________

David E. Campbell, Ph.D.        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Psychology        Phone: 707-826-3721
Humboldt State University       FAX:   707-826-4993
Arcata, CA  95521-8299          www.humboldt.edu/~campbell/psyc.htm


--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to