At 7:54 AM -0800 11/16/04, Jean-Marc Perreault wrote:
> In a case like this, the best strategy is to go back to the
original.
And if it turns out that serious harm is being done to what
Eysenck
really said (my prediction), then a cordial letter to the
offending
authors would be a good idea. They probably said that Pavlov used
a
bell too.
Stephen
Indeed, the authors do mention a Bell when discussing Pavlov's dogs...
That was Igor Bell, Pavlov's lab assistant.
I'll start drafting a letter... ;)
--
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
* http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
