So here we are, coming up on the scheduled and advertised poster session with only 20 or so lit review papers (and zero "science" projects or studies) that have to be put into poster format. In the past, we've had the 2 or 3 students doing lit reviews force their papers into a sort of scientific format: abstract, basic introduction, body, discussion, and potential future research. With so many this year, and the commitment to a poster session, it seems we should come up with a different standard that while making it clear to the "paper-writers" that presenting literature reviews as posters is really not appropriate or professional, they still must be able to put the review into a format that makes it "glance-able" and reviewable by their mentors and peers. (We are going to eliminate the option to produce a literature review next year; this is a one-time dilemma.)
I'll appreciate any thoughts, comments, advice, etc that anyone might offer... :-) ...!!
thanks!!
cjb
Colleen J. Burnham
Teaching Associate, Psychology
Colby College
Mayflower Hill Drive
Waterville, ME 04901
office 207 872 3407
fax 207 872 3096
home 207 465 9204
home fax 207 465 9202
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
******************
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
