Chris Green wrote, starting by quoting from my message:
>> Chris may find this whole thing rather boring, but I think there
>> is still a certain interest in the fact that probably the great 
>> majority of the verbal slips people routinely call "Freudian"
>> fail to fit a fundamental criterion for their actually being
>> Freudian slips (regardless of whether one thinks the *accurate*
>> application of his notion has some validity or not). 

>My apologies if I was harsh, Allen. I must confess to some
>fatigue with the Freud industry, pro and con.


Thanks for the gracious apology, Chris.

At the risk of going on boringly on this topic, I think I should make my
point absolutely explicit, which I don't think I may have done before. In
*The Psychopathology of Everyday Life* Freud wrote of the class of events
susceptible to "psycho-analytic methods of investigation" (including
appropriate slips of the tongue):

"[I]n order to be included in the class of phenomena explicable in this
way, a psychical parapraxis must fulfil the following conditions:
.........
(c) If we perceive the parapraxis at all, we must not be aware of any
motive for it...."

In other words, the psychological "motive" for the unwanted substitution
of one word by another must be unconscious, unknown to the person making
the slip, if it is to be classified as "Freudian". This was obviously not
the case with Stephen's slip.

And, on his behalf, may I note that when Stephen gave another, equivalent,
example and wrote "someone should study why we do this", he had his tongue
very firmly in his cheek. (Now Stephen won't need to point this out, and
will be free to use up his three postings for today on the other topics he
is engaged with. How he finds time to do any marking is a mystery...)

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.human-nature.com/esterson/index.html
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=10
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=57
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=58
http://www.psychiatrie-und-ethik.de/infc/1_gesamt_en.html

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to