|
Chris et al.: I assume that the correspondence to which Todd refers is
the famous 1934 exchange between the American psychologist (of
Washington University) Saul Rosenzweig (who passed away last year) and
Sigmund Freud. Rosenzweig sent Freud a description of some
experimental work he had conducted that appeared to verify the
existence of repression, and Freud responded by informing Rosenzweig
that his interesting work was in essence an act of supererogation given
the enormous mountain of evidence already available to corroborate
psychoanalytic propositions. Here's a brief description that I fished off a Web Site: In a letter written in 1934 to the American psychologist Saul Rosenzweig Freud reacts to the suggestion to perform experimental test of psychoanalytic assertions with some polite words but then continues:
In any case, the example that Todd provides of a single letter (written when? to whom?) hardly makes the general case. (Imagine if someone attempt to dismiss *your* whole career by citing the last time to "brushed off" an annoying stranger who e-mailed their "study" that "proved" wrong something you had been working on your whole adult life. Yes, of course you "should" check each thing on its merits, but there are only so many hours in the day... and how much material of this sort do famous receive? I'm *not* famous and already get a ton of inappropriate e-mail requests.) -- Scott O. Lilienfeld, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Psychology, Room 206 Emory University 532 N. Kilgo Circle Atlanta, Georgia 30322 (404) 727-1125 (phone) (404) 727-0372 (FAX) Home Page: http://www.emory.edu/PSYCH/Faculty/lilienfeld.html The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice: www.srmhp.org The Master in the Art of Living makes little distinction between his work and his play, his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his education and his recreation, his love and his intellectual passions. He hardly knows which is which. He simply pursues his vision of excellence in whatever he does, leaving others to decide whether he is working or playing. To him – he is always doing both. - Zen Buddhist text (slightly modified)--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Was freud a Scientist? Todd Nelson
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Drnanjo
- RE: Was freud a Scientist? Marc Carter
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? jim clark
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Christopher D. Green
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Christopher D. Green
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Todd Nelson
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Paul Smith
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Christopher D. Green
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Scott Lilienfeld
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Allen Esterson
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Allen Esterson
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Scott Lilienfeld
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Paul Brandon
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Allen Esterson
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Christopher D. Green
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Charles Harris
- Re: Was freud a Scientist? Allen Esterson
- Was Freud a scientist? Stephen Black
- Re: Was Freud a scientist? Allen Esterson
