|
According to a research
article in the lastest issue of Teaching of Psychology
(Harp & Maslich, p. 100ff.), including "seductive details" in
lectures to "spice them up" or make the "more relevant" actually
degrades students' recall of the important facts that were to be
learned. The article uses the example of a lecture about the physical basis of lightning, and includes, in the experimental condition, additional "seductive" details such as that lightning kills about 150 Americans per year. This is admittedly some distance from my own specialty, history of psychology, but I couldn't help but wonder about all those "instersting asides" we often include in history of psychology courses in order to "fill out" the characters we describe, or "real world" examples we attempt to generate, thinking that they increase our students' interest in the topic (and therefore, presumably, their performance on papers, tests, etc.). Of course, the line between an "interesting aside" and legitimate historical material -- though not "intellectual" in nature -- is not all that clear. For instance, do we talk (and how much) about the scandals that drove Baldwin and Watson from the academy because they are important to the history of the discipline, or because they are likely to generate "student interest"? I suppose one way to "operationalize" (if I, of all people, may use that term) this question is to ask ourselves whether it is a matter about which we would be likely to examine students. If so, then it is part of the "core" matrerial of the course. If not, then we may be using it merely as a "seductive detail," and it may be interefering with the information we primarily wish to convey. Anyway, interesting and difficult questions to consider. Regards, --
---
Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- "seductive details" in lecture Christopher D. Green
- RE: "seductive details" in lectur... Peterson, Douglas \(USD\)
- RE: "seductive details" in lectur... John Kulig
