| Don, I'm no stats guru, but I'll throw this out as a way to characterize the bird's behavior with respect to probability:
---
It seems to me that "chance" in this situation would be defined by the bird's normal feeding behavior. So, if you know how often (before your manipulation) it goes to the right first, then you could use the binomial distribution to figure out the probability of getting a certain number of "right" responses. So, considering the first repetition on each day, assuming that the bird's normal behavior is to go to the left first 95% of the time (and assuming each trial is independent, and that the probability of going left doesn't change, which is essentially the null hypothesis), the probability of getting zero "right" responses in the first 7 trials is about 1.0. The probability of getting four "right" responses in the last 7 trials is about 0.0002. This suggests to me that either this was a very, very unusual set of trials, or that the bird is now more likely to go to the right first (i.e., your manipulation worked). Cheers, Chris Lovelace --� Christopher T. Lovelace, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Psychology, University of Missouri - Kansas City 4825 Troost, Room 111-F, Kansas City, MO 64110 Voice: (816) 235-1067, Fax: (816) 235-1062 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iml.umkc.edu/psyc/faculty/lovelace/ On May 26, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Don Allen wrote:
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Re: Stats question Don Allen
- Re: Stats question David Epstein
- Re: Stats question Christopher Lovelace
- Re: Stats question Michael Scoles
- Re: Stats question Michael Scoles
