At 7:37 PM -0500 11/30/05, Allen Esterson wrote:
Oops! That should have read:
Thanks, Don, for injecting a welcome dose of common sense into the debate,
something notably lacking in the great bulk of the writings by proponents
of the "COLLABORATION" thesis.
Actually, I'm not sure that it deserves to be called a debate
since all the evidence is on one side and little but (to be
charitable) agenda driven speculation on the other.
Debate requires supporting one's assertions, not simply
stating them.
--
The best argument against
Intelligent Design is that people believe in it.
* PAUL K.
BRANDON
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Department 507-389-6217 *
* 23 Armstrong Hall Minnesota State University, Mankato *
* http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
* Psychology Department 507-389-6217 *
* 23 Armstrong Hall Minnesota State University, Mankato *
* http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
