Tim Shearon noted, regarding my post with the header "teen s*x": > is anyone else's posts on the thread "Teen S*x" getting sent to your spam > mail. This was odd because I saw many of the responses to the original > post and couldn't find the origin of the thread. Then late this evening > I looked in the spam folder - ta-da!
Others also have had difficulty. Rather than my original header being merely boring (as I complained in a follow-up post), it shows my naivety in not realizing that what I thought was an innocuous phrase instead meant big trouble. It actually confirms my point that in America, the trend is towards no sex for anyone at any time, not even in writing. The thought police are among you. If I may be permitted to kvell concerning my own country, my favourite commentator on matters sexual, Marty Klein, had this to say in a recent essay on the news that swingers' clubs have been pronounced legal in Canada by our Supreme Court. "Some countries attempt to export democracy abroad. Other countries actually practice it." (see http://www.sexualintelligence.org/ and I hope that url doesn't make this message spam either). Here's the suppressed original message from me: ---------------------- Alerted through another list, I offer this rather remarkable report on restriction of freedom in young people in today's New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31sex.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all Why does it always seem to be Kansas that's involved? Stephen ___________________________________________________ Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Department of Psychology Bishop's University Lennoxville, QC J1M 1Z7 Canada Dept web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy TIPS discussion list for psychology teachers at http://faculty.frostburg.edu/psyc/southerly/tips/index.htm _______________________________________________ --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
