I agree with Ttocs. Except I would add that I think if you do this, your stneduts are likely to think this a bit diputs or even eninissa. So, are you going to give a llip? Or an niotcejni. Uh, last time I looked you don't tell anyone they are receiving a placebo (or whatever drug it is). So how is spelling it backwards actually going to change anything? I can't help but think you are confused about how drug studies are actually done. Mit
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Lilienfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:50 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: Re: My groundbreaking research strategy Unfortunately, I've tried this study before and the manuscript was detcejer by all of the journals. So I wouldn't dnemmocer it. ..Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "michael sylvester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:27 AM Subject: My groundbreaking research strategy > Hi folks! > Need some opinion on a research strategy.One group of > participants will receive a placebo and the other group will receive the > drug obecalp (placebo spelled backwards).Obecalp is really the same > placebo.Any predictions as to possible outcomes. > Obecalp will be paraded as improving test performance. > > Michael J.Sylvester,PhD > Daytona Beach,Florida > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Sent via FalconMail e-mail system at falconmail.dbcc.edu > > > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
