On 20 Mar 2006 at 0:13, Jim Clark wrote:

> This article [on the  TGN1412 mishap] does not say much about the
> suppression of negative  effects in drug trials, which can happen and 
> indeed has happened in  Canada.  Suppression of negative effects could > of 
> course lead to more intensive exposures than warranted.  See 
> discussion of Olivieri case  at U  of Toronto affiliated hospital on 
> the website of the Canadian Association  of University Teachers.  
 
> http://www.caut.ca/en/issues/academicfreedom/default.asp 

I seem to be the only TIPSter besides Jim still up tonight. So it'll have 
to be me who points out that the Olivieri case, celebrated in Canada as 
an example of dedicated scientist standing up to Big Pharma for truth and 
justice, may be less than it seems. For example, see a MacLean's magazine 
review of a book on the affair at:

www.macleans.ca/culture/books/article.jsp?content=20050509_105255_105255

As for the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT), of which I 
was a member for many years, I think there's also another version of the 
equally celebrated David Healy case than the one they tell, a case which 
touches on the same issues.  My short version is that Healy was right 
about SSRIs causing an increased risk of suicide, but right for the wrong 
reasons. And while I'm beating up on the CAUT, I don't think much of 
their activism on the subject of asbestos either. But I guess we don't 
want to go there. 

Stephen

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.          
Department of Psychology     
Bishop's University                e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennoxville, QC J1M 1Z7
Canada

Dept web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
TIPS discussion list for psychology teachers at
http://faculty.frostburg.edu/psyc/southerly/tips/index.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to