|
Bill, It is clear to me that FC always has been, and still remains, BS. If you'd like a more "nuanced" view to quote, try this one from the National Autistic Society (of the UK): http://www.nas.org.uk/nas/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=297&a=3285. As for the APS (which has recently changed its name to the Association for Psychological Science), here's a reference to a study published their flagship journal (though it is not an "official" communication of the Society/Association): Burgess, C.A., Kirsch, I., Shane, H., Niederauer, K.L., Graham, S.M., & Bacon, A. (1998). Facilitated communication as an ideomotor response. Psychological Science, 9, 71-74. This article seems to be available on-line at: pubpages.unh.edu/~jel/713cog/facilitated_comm.pdf It is an interesting study in which college students were trained to "facilitate" and then asked to do so with a confederate, who they were told was "developmentally delayed and unable to speak." Even though the confederate had no comminucative intentions, the subjects managed to "faciliate" intelligible "communications" 89% of the time. The phrase, "Ouija board" appears soon afterwards. :-) Regards, -- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 416-736-5115 ex. 66164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.yorku.ca/christo ============================= Bill Southerly wrote: Does the scientific opinion continue to be that facilitated communication --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english |
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? Christopher D. Green
- [tips] RE: Facilitated Communication ? Rick Froman
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? Mike Palij
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? Annette Taylor, Ph. D.
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? Kris Vasquez
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? tamara hoffman
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? Lavin, Michael
- [tips] Re: Facilitated Communication ? Jonathan Mueller
