On 26 October Chris Green drew attention to an article about a new book
about misattributed quotations:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061025/en_nm/arts_quotations_dc

A quote from the article:
"A new, meticulously researched book of quotations attempts to set the
record straight on those beloved phrases that have crept into everyday use
as signs of wisdom and wit, including Sigmund Freud's sage advice that
"sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." (He didn't quite say that, although
his biographer thinks he would have approved of the idea.)"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061025/en_nm/arts_quotations_dc


>...his biographer thinks Freud would have approved of the idea<

But how could anyone ever *demonstrate* in any particular case that "a
cigar is just a cigar"? It is always, but always, possible to find
associations (whether it is the analyst, as frequently in the case of
Freud's analysis of "Dora", or the analysand doing the "free-associating")
to any object of thought which lead *somewhere* (especially to the kind of
"repressed" idea that the analyst is looking for -:) ), as Sebastiano
Timpanaro cogently demonstrated in his discussion of the celebrated
"aliquis" analysis from "The Psychopathology of Everyday Life". (An
extract from Timpanaro's examination of this "slip" is in the chapter
"Error's Reign" in _Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend_, ed.
F. Crews.)

References

Crews, F. (ed.) (1998). Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend.
London and New York: Viking Press, pp. 94-105.
Freud, S. (1901). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. The Standard
Edition, vol. 6, London: Hogarth Press, pp. 8-14.
Timpanaro, S. (1976). The Freudian Slip: Psychoanalysis and Textual
Analysis. London: New Left Books, pp. 29-61.

Incidentally, in the article "Freud, Minna Bernays, and the Conquest of
Rome: New Light on the Origins of Psychoanalysis" (The New American
Review, Spring/Summer 1982, pp. 1-23), Peter J. Swales makes a strong case
that the young "aquaintance" whose "aliquis" slip is analysed is actually
Freud himself (as is known to be the case in respect to the supposed
interlocutor in Freud's 1899 "Screen Memories" paper).
 

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
http://www.esterson.org/

http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=182
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=201

---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to