On 26 October 2006 Stephen Black wrote: >In the form of epigenetics. Lamarck, it seems, is no longer a heresy. http://tinyurl.com/ux3bk
Is nothing sacred? -:) Seriously, I await with interest further information (and research) from experts in the field. Allen Esterson Former lecturer, Science Department Southwark College, London http://www.esterson.org/ --------------------------------------- Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:41:40 -0400 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Jean-Baptiste Lamarck rides again Body: In the form of epigenetics. Lamarck, it seems, is no longer a heresy. > In the form of epigenetics. Lamarck, it seems, is no longer a heresy. > > See "Inherited pollution", http://tinyurl.com/ux3bk > [http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?type=article&article_id=21 > 8392863], and be afraid, be very afraid. > > And apropos of my comments in response to Paul Okami on the increase in > open access to scientific journals, bot of the _Endocrinology_ articles > by the Skinner group (no, not that one, this one's Michael) are available > as electronic preprints on the web. > > At http://tinyurl.com/y8zj8a > > (although at 51 and 38 double-spaced pages each, I'm not too anxious to > download them) > > Stephen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Stephen L. Black, Ph.D. > Department of Psychology > Bishop's University e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2600 College St. > Sherbrooke QC J1M 0C8 > Canada > > Dept web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy > TIPS discussion list for psychology teachers at > http://faculty.frostburg.edu/psyc/southerly/tips/index.htm > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
