So, I should not expect college seniors and graduate students to
multiply 2.5 x .20 x .80 in their heads?  Or, if I get them started by
saying, 2.5 x .20 = 0.5, they should still be reaching for their
calculators to figure out half of .80?  (Oops, I forgot--they don't
recognize that 0.5 is one-half, or that one-half of a fractional value
is meaningful!)




Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology & Counseling
University of Central Arkansas
Conway, AR 72035
501-450-5418
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/28/07 1:11 AM >>>
If I ran the schools, I'd first ensure that students had really good 
facility with their calculators, so they have a fast and reliable way of

getting the right answers. Then,  with the time saved from not having to

teach obsolete algorithms,  I'd spend more time on teaching the 
underlying concepts of math and on more advanced topics.

 Sometimes we cling to old technology longer than we should because it's

familiar and it served us so well. I'd guess there was the same debate 
when we first decided to give up counting on our fingers in favour of 
making marks on papyrus. But I think it turned out to be a pretty good 
decision in the end. 


---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to