That would be a faith-based moral code. I don't think the two need be defined that way--they are not by definition mutually inclusive. Carol L. DeVolder, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology Chair, Department of Psychology St. Ambrose University 518 West Locust Street Davenport, Iowa 52803 Phone: 563-333-6482 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> web: http://web.sau.edu/psychology/psychfaculty/cdevolder.htm
________________________________ From: Paul Brandon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 4/6/2007 2:10 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: [tips] RE: [SPAM] Re: It's what they believe At 12:35 PM -0500 4/6/07, DeVolder Carol L wrote: >I don't understand why a moral code can't come from within an >idividual or from society in general. Why does it suppose the >existence of a divine entity? By definition, according to some religions. -- The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that people believe in it. * PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Psychology Dept Minnesota State University * * 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 * * http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~pkbrando/ * --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english <http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0<=english>
<<winmail.dat>>
--- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
