I can see I need to amend the last sentence in my previous message so that
we don't get caught up on a side-issue:

So what is it with people who have to (re)define the non-religious
societies of Stalin or Mao as "religious" so that they can maintain their
faith (and I use the word advisedly) that their atheist intellectual
position somehow precludes the possibility of government-level
perpetration of barbarities on a mass scale in a society in which atheism
is the prevailing creed.

Allen Esterson

---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to