Jim -
Those are good points. It also depends on the "target" for grading. In grad 
school, I once made a 72 on the final (the ONLY evaluation). I felt horrible. I 
studied my sitting part off!! (No. I didn't complain I'd worked harder!) I was 
sitting in stunned silence - contemplating what I might do instead of finishing 
my PhD. My study partner leaned over and said, "What'd you get?" He'd made an 
80 and was distraught- I pointed out "At least you passed." We were both 
thinking maybe we made the wrong decision when the Prof walked back in and put 
his hand on my shoulder and looked at my friend and said, "Congratulations, 
guys." We both looked puzzled. He explained that he'd given variants of that 
test to grad students for over 25 years- we'd made the highest two grades he'd 
ever scored (mine was actually just a tie with two others from past years- my 
friend had destroyed the curve!). The mean (passing?) was mid 40s. I was 
planning on celebrating but went home and slept instead. :) 
 
I always remind my students that half of all physicians finished in the bottom 
50% of their classes. Doesn't mean much but it is funny to watch it wash over 
their faces that there is a 50% chance that it could be their physician! 
Tim
 
_______________________________
Timothy O. Shearon, PhD
Professor and Chair Department of Psychology
Albertson College of Idaho
Caldwell, ID 83605
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and 
systems

________________________________

From: Jim Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/8/2007 10:49 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Re: grading and standards and multiple institutions



Hi

It is common (standard?) in Canadian universities for 50% to define the
pass boundary (at least in the 3-4 I have taught for).  It is an
interesting question whether students interpret it as meaning they need
to know "half" the material, but that is of course not a necessary
implication of 50% (on a single test, for example) being a pass.  The
average mark on a test will be some function of the proportion of
questions of different difficulty on the test, as implied by Steven's
comment about "raising the bar."  Put enough challenging questions on a
test and 50% might actually represent A performance, not simply a pass.
Put enough easy questions and then 60, 70, or even 80% might be a more
realistic value for a pass.

It would be interesting to know how different grading standards relate
to some common metric (e.g., GRE scores?).

Take care
Jim

James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



<<winmail.dat>>

---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to