In that case, since Fisher didn't bother to enlighten us as to the meaning of 
z, I have a perfectly logical (which, in all things etymological, is synonymous 
with "wrong") explanation you can feel free to hand out to anyone who asks 
(please don't give me credit). It is called the z-distribution, short for the 
"zero distribution", since 0 is the mean, median and mode of the distribution. 
This explanation has the advantage of being face valid and, evidently, unless 
deeper research finds additional information, irrefutable.

Rick


Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
John Brown University
2000 W. University
Siloam Springs, AR  72761
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(479) 524-7295
http://www.jbu.edu/academics/hss/faculty/rfroman.asp



"Pete, it's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart."
- Ulysses Everett McGill



-----Original Message-----
From: Blaine Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:32 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] History of z-scores

Hello Doug

here is an answer to your question (see below) provided by some kindly 
statisticians

blaine

From: Richard Scheaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 7:18 PM
To: Applebaugh, Gwendolyn N.
Subject: Re: [tips] History of z-scores



On the other hand, you might try these references.  It seems that Fisher 
never gave a good reason as to why he called this statistic z.

Dick

The terms z and the z DISTRIBUTION were introduced by R. A. Fisher in "On a 
Distribution Yielding the Error Functions of Several well Known Statistics" 
<http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher/36.pdf> , Proceedings 
of the International Mathematics Congress, Toronto (1924).
Fisher's development of the analysis of variance in this paper and in his 
book Statistical Methods for Research Workers 
<http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Fisher/Methods/index.htm>  (1925) was based 
on the z distribution. Fisher's z is related to the modern F by z = ยจ ln F


[See http://members.aol.com/jeff570/z.html
and
 http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/coll/special//fisher/36.pdf]

Dick

On 10/1/07 7:43 PM, "Richard Scheaffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm sorry to say that I do not know the answer to this, but you might find 
> it
> in the Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms if you can locate a copy in 
> a
> library.
>
> Dick Scheaffer





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wallen, Douglas J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:19 AM
Subject: [tips] History of z-scores


Hello all,

I have wondered occasionally why z-scores were named "z" and who named them. 
I have done some browsing for the information but have not yet located it. 
Does anyone have a reference or knowledge of the z-score's origins?

Thanks,


Douglas Wallen
Psychology Department, AH 23
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Mankato, MN 56001

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (507) 389-5818


--- 


---

---

Reply via email to