Of course, but I've typically found people to be more responsive to
legal than to epistemic imperatives. :-)
Chris Green
=========
Marc Carter wrote:
Not to speak of the importance of remaining neutral in the face of what
may be the largest mass of scientific data pointing to a single fact.
I mean, one wouldn't want to be *hasty* and jump to any conclusions....
Sheesh. What a country. What a *state* (and I'm a native Texican).
m
------
"There is no power for change greater than a community discovering what
it cares about."
--
Margaret Wheatley
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher D. Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:32 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Evolution Debate Led to Ouster, Texas Official Says
I didn't know that one had to be "neutral" on a topic that a Federal
court had ruled unconstitutional to teach in US public schools.
http://tinyurl.com/2sbqms
(NYT, so you'll need to be registered.)
Chris
---
