At 8:45 AM -0600 12/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On 10 Dec 2007 at 1:17, Christopher D. Green wrote: > >> Here's Richard Nisbett's response to the Slate piece by Richard Saletan >> that Stephen Black recommended to us back on Nov 22. Turns out that >> Saletan's easy certainties are no more certain than Jensen's of >> Herrnstein's. >> http://tinyurl.com/3bduvl > >and yet another thoughtful kick at this controversial can, this time by >Malcolm Gladwell in the _New Yorker_ December 17th, which does require a >little trip into the future to retrieve it, here: > >http://tinyurl.com/2xnmbj > >And while you're on the site, and if you have the time for it, check out >a remarkable example of medical journalism at: > >http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/12/10/071210fa_fact_gawande
Medical journalism in the NewYorker would be remarkable! -- The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that people believe in it. * PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Psychology Dept Minnesota State University * * 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 * * http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~pkbrando/ * ---
