Beth writes: > It occurred to me that two articles from over 30 years ago didn't sound > very convincing. A new search turned up the same finding, however, in > an article publihed in 2004: [...]
Sorry, Beth, I don't understand the above. What I cited were not "two articles" but two research studies involving a large number of subjects. I also don't understand why the fact they were undertaken over 30 years ago should be relevant. All that matters is whether or not the research methodology was satisfactory. Allen Esterson Former lecturer, Science Department Southwark College, London http://www.esterson.org --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
