I do not quite agree that the failure to replicate (as in the Miller anhd DiCara studies) is ground for questioning the validity of a study.A replication may not be equivalent to the original study.Subject variables and environmental variables may vary.It could be that the targeted replicated subjects may be afrom a different gene pool.And there is always the possibility that the original finding was a fluke of nature or special circumstanceYogis have been known to exert control over alleged autonomic functions. And as farfetched this may sound-who polices the intravenous procedurs to avoid contamination.I doubt there is a new needle or vial for each subject.

Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida
                                  " Sleepless in Daytona"


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to