Psychology is a diverse collection of people with varying interests and beliefs 
in spite of the image some of us academics may try to foster of its scientific 
perspective.  I wonder if there are surveys of the clinical divisions that 
might give us a better idea as to how prevalent such non-sensical views really 
are regarding the belief in special individual talents, intuitions, or even 
psychic abilities?  I would expect/hope such views might be in the minority.  
    As far as evidence-based practices and alternative health treatments go,  I 
suspect individual practitioners will do what they can to make money and serve 
people in accord with their educational preparation and conscience.   There 
will always be questionable therapies and practices, and some will become 
mainstream regardless of their scientific basis--psychoanalytic, chiropractic, 
various transpersonal-mind-body-spirit approaches, etc. come to mind here, and 
all may have value to some regardless their evidential basis.  This is 
especially likely to be the case if the criteria is making people feel happy, 
giving attention and support, etc.  In this regard,  the poor person's 
therapists (psychics, chiropractics,  and spiritual counselors of all sorts) 
may have their place.  I hope their place is not in APA approved 
clinical/counseling programs, but such programs are not entirely driven by 
scientific perspectives.   We should also note and be alert to the problems and 
harm that various therapies and programs might promote.  In this regard, I 
copied (below) from another list and author a useful link.   I think we need to 
be cautious about these kinds of sites as I do not know if their information is 
correct, but it may be of interest and could be checked out.  Gary
 
 
 
http://whatstheharm.net/index.html 
 
 
 
 
 
Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D.
Professor, Psychology
Saginaw Valley State University
University Center, MI 48710
989-964-4491
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to