[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As for Chris's posting of the NY Times article on genetic differences 
> between MZ twins, it seems to me (if I've got the logic right) that it 
> carries with it an important conclusion for the use of twin studies in 
> psychology.
>
> When considering characteristics of MZ twins, under the usual assumption 
> that they have absolutely identical genetic specification, any 
> differences between them (in personality, for example) are ascribed to 
> the effect of the environment. 
>
> But now that we know that they can differ both for epigenetic reasons and 
> for copy number variation, we can no longer make this claim. Some degree 
> of the variation beween MZ twins formerly attributed to environmental 
> effects must instead be due to genetic variation. This means that the 
> genetic contribution for many psychological factors must be greater than 
> is estimated by conventional means.
>   
That conclusion fails, I think, to take into account two critical ideas, 
one old and one new. First the old -- the idea of dividing up "genetic" 
and "environmental" contributions like additive pieces of so much pie 
was always mistaken. The modes of combination is much more complicated 
than that. Second, the new -- epigenetics is utterly rewriting our 
understanding of how the genotype contributes to the structure and 
functions of organism. Far LESS than ever before can we say that a 
particular genetic structure "determines" anything. Epigenetic factors 
turn on, turn off, and dramatically change the effects of various genes.

It's a whole new game out there and our old claims about the effects of 
genes will soon look very much like our old claims about the effects of 
phrenology -- based on a deep misunderstanding of the ways in which 
things actually work.

Regards,
Chris
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

 

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/



"Part of respecting another person is taking the time to criticise his 
or her views." 

   - Melissa Lane, in a /Guardian/ obituary for philosopher Peter Lipton

=================================


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to