OK, but there is a difference between presenting the same primary report of the results of an empirical study in various venues and presenting work at various degrees of progress between journal publications. It seems that all of your papers and posters presented something new in the progress you were making on your program of research.
On the other hand, what about a well-known person who is invited to various events to present basically the same findings? These would be advertised as a review of the researcher's work in an area. I could imagine one person on the research rubber chicken circuit giving that presentation many times. However, I think it would be up to the promotion and tenure committee how they would judge that. My guess is that it wouldn't be an issue for most researchers famous enough to receive multiple invitations to speak about their research. Rick Dr. Rick Froman, Chair Division of Humanities and Social Sciences Box 3055 x7295 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jbu.edu/academics/hss/faculty/rfroman.asp Proverbs 14:15 "A simple man believes anything, but a prudent man gives thought to his steps." -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:05 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: Re: [tips] Double Dipping in Conference Papers :: Inside Higher Ed :: Higher Education's Source for News, Views and Jobs Good points. Sticky issue. I have had many presentations that on the surface may look like almost the same one but in fact were subsequent ones that incorporated changes based on previous presentations and the feedback acquired. Eventually these have lead to a publication that incorporated the total feedback. For example (this could be boring--it's a CV listing of my and my colleague's entire presentations and publications just regarding misconceptions): --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
